Bug 808203
Summary: | NM only accepts first RDNSS from router advertisements and disconnects because of RDNSS timeout | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pavel Šimerda (pavlix) <psimerda> |
Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Dan Williams <dcbw> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 17 | CC: | danw, dcbw, deejay1 |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-04-19 21:12:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Pavel Šimerda (pavlix)
2012-03-29 19:38:17 UTC
I forgot to add that this was experienced only on wireless so far. Happens also on F16 even with wired connetions with IPv6 enabled Hmm, now I actually have some positive messages: Apr 3 08:22:39 dragon NetworkManager[697]: <debug> [1333434159.114071] [nm-ip6-manager.c:730] process_nduseropt_rdnss(): (eth0): refreshing RA-provided nameserver fe80::20c:42ff:fe13:857b (expires in 1810 seconds) Still NetworkManager-0.9.4.0-1.git20120328.fc17.x86_64, kernel-3.3.0-1.fc17.x86_64 I don't know what makes the difference. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 785772 *** I believe this bugreport was closed duplicate by mistake. I don't see any relation between this bug and bug 785772. Yeah, sorry, I should have explained. NM's behavior in 785772 causes the kernel to discard every RA after the first one, so NM never sees another RDNSS notification after that and so is guaranteed to hit the timeout. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 785772 *** Ok then, but please don't close the other one. |