Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
How would the script run restorecon on the PID file, when that doesn't exist beforehand? If this is a bug, which I doubt, then it seems to me that it should be the province of the selinux policy to get this right to start with.
# grep pidfile= /etc/init.d/postgresql
pidfile="/var/run/postmaster.${PGPORT}.pid"
#
The init script creates the PID file. Path to the PID file is known. Calling restorecon at the end of start() would be enough.
My point is that the file doesn't exist beforehand and so it is being created under the control of the current security policy. If it's not correctly labeled, that's the fault of the security policy, not this script.
More to the point, since no AVC denial occurs, I suspect that the labeling is just fine and so the real problem is not the actual label but restorecon's opinion of what the label "should be". I wouldn't be too surprised if adding a restorecon here created a problem instead of fixing one.
Anyway, reassigning to selinux-policy to see what they think.
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does postgresql actually write to this file? Or is it just created by the init script?
At the moment it's created directly by the init script, via code like
echo $pid > "$pidfile"
The whole thing is gone anyway in the systemd implementation, and if anyone complains about that we'd probably have to do something different to make it happen there.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0780.html