Bug 811772

Summary: Beta-RC4 gnome-packagekit fails to run (gpk-update-viewer)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: G.Wolfe Woodbury <redwolfe>
Component: gnome-packagekitAssignee: Richard Hughes <hughsient>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 17CC: awilliam, hughsient
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-05-19 00:56:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot of error message in gpk-update-viewer none

Description G.Wolfe Woodbury 2012-04-11 23:46:40 UTC
Description of problem:
 gnome-packagekit (gpk-update-viewer) fails auth due to "<" in input stream


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 gnome-packagekit-3.4.0-1

How reproducible:
 always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install beta-rcr dvd
2. run software update
3.
  
Actual results:
 error after confirming signing key

Expected results:
 no error

Additional info:
 attaching screenshot from vbox install

Comment 1 G.Wolfe Woodbury 2012-04-11 23:48:23 UTC
Created attachment 576917 [details]
screenshot of error message in gpk-update-viewer

Comment 2 G.Wolfe Woodbury 2012-04-11 23:49:16 UTC
workaround: yum update

Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2012-04-12 15:55:16 UTC
I didn't see this in testing.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 4 G.Wolfe Woodbury 2012-04-12 19:41:20 UTC
It only happens if gpk-update-viewer is the app that tries to load the signing key for the repositories.

any use of yum or gpk-application will properly handle the key import.

I can force this error via any install method prior to todays updates.

Comment 5 G.Wolfe Woodbury 2012-05-19 00:56:11 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 794927 ***