Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||[as7]Improve deployment semantics in domain mode|
|Product:||[Other] RHQ Project||Reporter:||Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp>|
|Component:||Plugins||Assignee:||Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Mike Foley <mfoley>|
|Target Release:||RHQ 4.4.0|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-09-01 05:57:22 EDT||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Heiko W. Rupp 2012-04-12 05:03:06 EDT
From Bug 767974 : Still this needs more work as the "deployment" type needs to be better specified for server-group and managed server level * you don't want to upload content to individual managed servers * the server-group has no notion of the "hash" * different server groups may want to run different apps with the same runtime name
Comment 1 Heiko W. Rupp 2012-04-13 10:50:30 EDT
For rhq.4.4 * ManagedServer get a MSDeployment type that does not allow create/delete * users need to be presented with runtime-name+name so distinguish what to deploy where.
Comment 2 Heiko W. Rupp 2012-04-17 08:51:10 EDT
Note that we have a general issue in RHQ here : deploying to a server group and undeploying only directly manipulates the RHQ-resources on server group level. The deployments on managed server level - are not directly added to the inventory - are not (directly) removed from inventory RHQ currently has no mechanism to e.g. trigger re-scans (which for a server group can even span multiple agents) or to auto-remove those un-deployed files.
Comment 4 Heiko W. Rupp 2013-09-01 05:57:22 EDT
Bulk closing of items that are on_qa and in old RHQ releases, which are out for a long time and where the issue has not been re-opened since.