|Summary:||cipe interface preventing route from going into kernel|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz>|
|Component:||cipe||Assignee:||Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||David Lawrence <dkl>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2003-02-24 02:20:00 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Ted Kaczmarek 2003-01-06 23:34:44 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030104 Description of problem: Route will not install if cipe interface ip is in same address space. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Bring up cipe inteface on HOST A with ip of 192.168.200.1 and HOST B peer of 192.168.200.2 2.Have bgp peer HOST A send 192.168.0.0/16 route to HOST B 3.Confirm route in bgp table, not in kernel routing table Actual Results: Route of 192.168.0.0/16 is not put in kernel routing table. Expected Results: Route of 192.168.0.0/16 is put into kernel routing table. Additional info: As a test instead of sending the /16 which overlaps the cipe interface, I sent it as a /17, that route does get put into the kernel routing table. Wasn't sure if this is kernel or cipe, but it is definelty cipe related. I even advertised the same route from another peer (Router C)across the ethernet0 and saw the same issue. Will attach a diagram as well.
Comment 1 Ted Kaczmarek 2003-01-06 23:50:39 UTC
*** Bug 81241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Ted Kaczmarek 2003-02-24 02:20:00 UTC
This problem does not occur with 2.4.18-24.8.0, no point in leaving this open.