| Summary: | Need support for a shared 'meta' volume to store 'extra'-glusterd (clustering) information. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | krishnan parthasarathi <kparthas> |
| Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | krishnan parthasarathi <kparthas> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | mainline | CC: | amarts, gluster-bugs, jdarcy, nsathyan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-27 09:22:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
krishnan parthasarathi
2012-04-14 07:34:18 UTC
Creating a special kind of automatically created volume seems like a pretty significant change, and since it's only for such a specific purpose I think there needs to be a lot more discussion about requirements and alternatives. How *exactly* would CTDB use this, what characteristics must it have, why can't CTDB use a standard manually created volume, how else might CTDB solve those problems, and what other things might benefit from this feature if it were defined a bit differently? Currently we are planning to fix the issue by having the proper hooks itself, instead of creating a 'meta' volume. |