Bug 817258

Summary: submit results to catalog with filename missing ".gz"
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program Reporter: Guangze Bai <gbai>
Component: Test Suite (harness)Assignee: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Guangze Bai <gbai>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 1.5CC: czhang, rlandry, wshen, yshao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
no tech note needed.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-05 21:37:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 767775    
Attachments:
Description Flags
catalog.py patch adding ".gz" to the "filename" param on submit none

Description Guangze Bai 2012-04-28 11:14:14 UTC 
Description of problem:

When running v7 submit to send the results to catalog, catalog got the gzipped results xml, but the xmlrpc parameter 'filename' does not contain .gz suffix.

e.g. in this cert
http://hwcert-web2-test.devel.redhat.com/show.cgi?id=731356
you can observe this line:
v7-results-wlan-5-101.nay.redhat.com-20120428110451.xml (id=518806)
Wei Shen thought it should be:
v7-results-wlan-5-101.nay.redhat.com-20120428110451.xml.gz (id=518806)
and he said the file name accuracy is crucial to catalog function. So open this bug.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
v7-1.5-21

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. v7 plan
2. v7 run -t info
3. v7 submit and open the cert url to see this wrong results file name
Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2012-04-30 17:51:03 UTC 
Created attachment 581237 [details]
catalog.py patch adding ".gz" to the "filename" param on submit
Comment 5 Caspar Zhang 2012-06-04 08:05:59 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
no tech note needed.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-05 21:37:47 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0711.html