Bug 82104

Summary: /etc/services has not info about icq
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Andy Shevchenko <andy>
Component: setupAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0CC: dimitri.papadopoulos, petr, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 18:51:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Andy Shevchenko 2003-01-17 16:02:35 UTC
Description of problem:
In /etc/services info about icq IM standart ports is absent.

Additional info:

Only add the two lines like
icq 4000/udp
icq 5190/tcp

Comment 1 Dimitri Papadopoulos 2003-11-13 11:26:34 UTC
Hi,

This service is still missing from /etc/services in Fedora Core 1.

Actually lots more services are missing, such as distcc:
distcc          3632/tcp   distributed compiler
distcc          3632/udp   distributed complier
#                          Martin Pool <mbp> November 2002

Please sync /etc/services with IANA's current list:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

Note that there's a problem with icq, as it's using well-known ports
already assigned to other software:
terabase        4000/tcp   Terabase
terabase        4000/udp   Terabase
#                          Thor Olson <Thor>
aol             5190/tcp   America-Online
aol             5190/udp   America-Online
#                          Marty Lyons <marty>
I don't think icq should be added to /etc/services.


Comment 2 Dimitri Papadopoulos 2003-11-13 11:30:47 UTC
I wrote:
> Note that there's a problem with icq, as it's using well-known ports

Instead I meant:
Note that there's a problem with icq, as it's using registered ports


Comment 3 Dimitris 2004-02-15 11:26:26 UTC
This is a duplicate of:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112298



Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-16 18:58:03 UTC
*** Bug 112298 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2004-05-05 03:29:21 UTC
Updated to IANA in 2.5.32-1.

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2004-05-05 03:42:28 UTC
Deferred from 2.5.32-1

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2004-09-23 05:32:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1907 ***

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 18:51:13 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.