Bug 821345
Summary: | Promotions changeset of system template does not solve dependency of product | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | james labocki <jlabocki> |
Component: | Content Management | Assignee: | Dmitri Dolguikh <ddolguik> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hayk Hovsepyan <hhovsepy> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.0.1 | CC: | achan, asettle, bkearney, dmacpher, dmitri, jrist, lzap, mmccune, omaciel |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
changeset promotions did not add required products if only system templates were added to a changeset. This update adds an error message in this situation:
"Please add %s products to the changeset '%s' if you wish to promote the repository with it."
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-04 19:45:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
james labocki
2012-05-14 08:06:48 UTC
Verified that this is still and issue on RC1 Is this a documentation issue? Is the error appropriate? Only repos/packages can be added to a system template. Should we automatically promote the product or perhaps prompt them or force the user? Lets change the error messaging to state something to the effect of: "Failed to promote: Please add the RHEL6 product to the changeset if you wish to promote this with the system template" or something similar Tested on revision: katello-cli-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch candlepin-selinux-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch qpid-cpp-server-ssl-0.14-14.el6_2.x86_64 pulp-selinux-server-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch katello-cli-common-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch candlepin-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.14-14.el6_2.x86_64 katello-configure-1.1.9-3.el6cf.noarch katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch candlepin-tomcat6-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch pulp-common-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch qpid-cpp-server-0.14-14.el6_2.x86_64 katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch katello-all-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch python-qpid-0.14-7.el6_2.noarch python-isodate-0.4.4-4.pulp.el6.noarch qpid-cpp-client-0.14-14.el6_2.x86_64 pulp-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch katello-common-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch katello-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch m2crypto-0.21.1.pulp-7.el6.x86_64 python-oauth2-1.5.170-2.pulp.el6.noarch mod_wsgi-3.3-3.pulp.el6.x86_64 Message is changed, but it shows '#' instead of name of product. So it shows like this: "Please add '#' product to the changeset 'chzoo' if you wish to promote repository 'zoo' with it" Maybe this is because in promotion_changeset.rb code: "raise _("Please add '%s' product to the changeset '%s' if you wish to promote repository '%s' with it.") % [repo.product, self.name, repo.name]" it should be "repo.product.name" instead of "repo.product" in message param value. Reassigning to Dmitri. This is oneliner ^ :-) fixed in ea80c52 Verified on revision: katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-12.el6cf.noarch katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch katello-cli-1.1.8-6.el6cf.noarch katello-configure-1.1.9-6.el6cf.noarch katello-1.1.12-12.el6cf.noarch katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-12.el6cf.noarch katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch katello-cli-common-1.1.8-6.el6cf.noarch katello-common-1.1.12-12.el6cf.noarch katello-agent-1.1.2-1.el6cf.noarch Now it shows correct message with name of product. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist |