Bug 822413

Summary: inkscape doesn't build with poppler-0.20.0
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Marek Kašík <mkasik>
Component: inkscapeAssignee: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: duffy, kevin, lkundrak, rdieter, valavanisalex
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-23 19:37:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch none

Description Marek Kašík 2012-05-17 09:53:49 UTC 
Description of problem:
inkscape fails when built with new poppler-0.20.0.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
inkscape-0.48.2-5


Additional info:
This patch should fix the problem:
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/poppler20.patch?h=packages/inkscape
Comment 1 Sandro Mani 2012-05-27 00:44:42 UTC 
Created attachment 587053 [details]
Patch

Patch modified to apply cleanly on top of existing fedora package patches.
Comment 2 Alex Valavanis 2012-06-08 10:51:29 UTC 
See upstream Inkscape bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1005565
Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2012-06-23 15:41:00 UTC 
0.48.2-8

- fix icon/desktop-file scriptlets (#739375)
- drop .desktop vendor (f18+)
- inkscape doesn't build with poppler-0.20.0 (#822413)


http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4190484
Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2012-06-23 15:59:48 UTC 
boo, patch doesn't seem to work as advertised, looking closer now.
Comment 5 Rex Dieter 2012-06-23 16:39:36 UTC 
Hrm, seems to build ok locally on my f17 x86_64 box with poppler-0.20.0-1 installed.  Something odd going on. (f18 gcc/glibc differences?, missing builddep?)
Comment 6 Kevin Kofler 2012-06-23 18:03:11 UTC 
From the build failure, it looks like the first argument to the function "error" is being eaten somewhere, maybe something defining "error" as a macro?
Comment 7 Rex Dieter 2012-06-23 19:37:29 UTC 
OK, the version of the patch from https://launchpad.net/bugs/1005565 works, build succeeds now.