Bug 822494
| Summary: | planar test fails on non-x86 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
| Component: | libyuv | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 17 | CC: | karsten, lemenkov |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://code.google.com/p/libyuv/issues/detail?id=34 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-05-26 22:23:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Dan Horák
2012-05-17 14:17:41 UTC
and the reason is that "8.16 fixed point inverse table" is different between row_common.cc and row_posix.cc (which is the same as row_win.cc) T(0xf8), T(0xf9), T(0xfa), T(0xfb), T(0xfc), T(0xfd), T(0xfe), T(0xff) vs. T(0xf8), T(0xf9), T(0xfa), T(0xfb), T(0xfc), T(0xfd), T(0xfe), 0x100 Fixed in upstream svn revision 268. Peter, please update the package or give me green light for doing so, thanks. And I think this issue was also the reason for the failed EPEL builds. (In reply to comment #2) > Fixed in upstream svn revision 268. Peter, please update the package or give me > green light for doing so, thanks. > > And I think this issue was also the reason for the failed EPEL builds. Yep, that was the reason - I just tried to rebuild and it builds fine now. Will push new packages shortly. Thanks. You seem to forget to update the svn revision in the Release if I see correctly. (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks. You seem to forget to update the svn revision in the Release if I see > correctly. Yep, unfortunately I did. I won't rebuild it again - I just push fixed spec into Rawhide branch. Yeah, no problem. BTW I've also opened http://code.google.com/p/libyuv/issues/detail?id=36 to make libyuv usable. libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc16 libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.el5 libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc17 libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.el6 Package libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8090/libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. libyuv-0-0.8.20120518svn256.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |