Bug 823926

Summary: Rebase krb5 to 1.10 for AD trust to work
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Dmitri Pal <dpal>
Component: krb5Assignee: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Zbysek MRAZ <zmraz>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.3CC: dpal, ebenes, jplans, nc, prc, sbose, ssorce
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: krb5-1.10.3-5.el6 Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 08:37:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 791327    

Description Dmitri Pal 2012-05-22 13:13:42 UTC
Krb5 needs to be updated to 1.10 to deliver AD trust functionality.

Comment 2 Nalin Dahyabhai 2012-07-05 18:06:22 UTC
Simo, Sumit, can one of you elaborate on which changes after 1.9(.0) were needed for this?  I'm trying to enumerate a list, and going from the README files, tickets 6869, 6886, 6912, 6994/7007, 7016/7039, 7092/7102, and 7120/7142 look relevant.  We already backported some of those into the earlier update, though, and if we can backport the rest and avoid a complete rebase, I'd prefer it.

Comment 3 Simo Sorce 2012-07-06 15:45:19 UTC
From IRC:
<simo> nalin: all testing have been done with 1.10, we have no idea how to isolate only the necessary changes
<nalin> simo: is 1.9 even known to not work, then?
<simo> yes
<simo> 1.9 will NOT work
<nalin> because...?
<simo> changes in internal interfaces iirc, plus number of bugs, plus we didn't bother finding out what else

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 08:16:11 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:59:52 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:37:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0319.html