Bug 823937
| Summary: | Please include pg_journal | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tomasz Torcz <tomek> |
| Component: | postgresql | Assignee: | Tom Lane <tgl> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | devrim, hhorak, johannbg, marti, tgl |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-05-22 14:32:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Tomasz Torcz
2012-05-22 13:27:57 UTC
It is generally a bad idea, and I think actually against our packaging policy, for a single SRPM to include multiple upstream tarballs. (To point out just one reason why, which version number would you use for the package?) So I'm not going to consider adding this to the postgresql packages. The right way to approach this issue would be to get pg_journal added as a new, separate Fedora package. Perhaps you can interest Devrim in that, or failing that, you could become a packager yourself. Hi, AFAICS this depends on sd-journal.h, which is not available in Fedora (might be available in Debian though), so it does not seem to be easy to package. Regards, Devrim Hm it has been available since the journal got introduced into fedora as in systemd-devel package on F17 and F18. Has this module been submitted upstream for inclusion in postgresql? |