Bug 828787
Summary: | TLS error messages overwriting in tlsm_verify_cert() | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jan Vcelak <jvcelak> |
Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Jan Vcelak <jvcelak> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | David Spurek <dspurek> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | dspurek, ebenes, fdewaley, jsynacek, jvcelak, rmeggins, tsmetana |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | openldap-2.4.23-29.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause:
Self-signed certificate without Basic Constraint Extension is used as a server TLS certificate. TLS client is configured to ignore any TLS certificate validation errors.
Consequence:
Client cannot connect to the server and a wrong message about missing Basic Constraint Extension is emitted.
Fix:
Patch applied to preserve the original TLS certificate validation error if Basic Constraint Extension is not found in the certificate.
Result:
Client can connect to the server, error message about untrusted certification authority which signed the server certificate is emitted, the connection will continue as expected.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 810462 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2013-02-21 09:45:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 810462 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 836160 |
Description
Jan Vcelak
2012-06-05 11:38:23 UTC
Resolved in: openldap-2.4.23-29.el6 *** Bug 863456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0364.html |