Bug 83134
Summary: | Second NIC, eth1, does not recieve DHCP address | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Paul Witting <pwitting> |
Component: | dhcp | Assignee: | Daniel Walsh <dwalsh> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-03-10 21:41:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Paul Witting
2003-01-30 16:49:35 UTC
Modified the ks.cfg script to specify both adapters explicitly: network --interface eth0 --bootproto dhcp network --interface eth1 --bootproto dhcp Syntax may be off, but this is the crux of it. Both interfaces come right up now, curiously the network-scripts are identical from the config that works to the config that doesn't, implying that something else (beyond ifcfg-eth1) needs to be modified to let dhcp on the second interface work... I just tried this and it works fine on my machine. I am using with the latest dhcp client. Have you tried installing the version on rawhide? I'm sorry, but what did you try exactly, my initial problem (standard ks.cfg generated by redhat-config-kickstart) or my workaround (manually edit ks.cfg to specify both in my ammendment)? I'm curious because this was a very repeatable problem, on two different systems (same kickstart disk, redhat 8.0, psyche); making the change to the ks.cfg file made the problem go away even though there were no differences in the original ifcfg-eth1 and the now working ifcfg-eth1 But I'll leave it closed because I'm happy with my work-around for now and the systems are now in production, so I can no longer test. Adding to blocker bug 185486 and adding IBM group. The last changes to these bugs were mistakenly made. Removing incorrect blocker bug and confidential group. |