Bug 83257
Summary: | 'Show email source' still munges email. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2> | ||||
Component: | evolution-data-server | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-12-31 18:52:05 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
David Woodhouse
2003-01-31 22:39:55 UTC
Created attachment 89751 [details]
Sample mail.
I'm failing to see how it's mangled aside from how spamassassin mangled it. Point me to what I'm missing here This probably isn't going to come out well in this text box but... In the attached mail, the 'X-Spam-Report:' header is nicely formatted and readable. Each 'SPAM:' is on a new line after two spaces: X-Spam-Report: Detailed Report SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (9.60 hits, 5 required) SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME (1.3 points) From: does not include a real name SPAM: TO_MALFORMED (0.6 points) To: has a malformed address Evolution displays it more like this: X-Spam-Report: Detailed Report SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (9.60 hits, 5 required) SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME (1.3 points) From: does not include a real name SPAM: TO_MALFORMED (0.6 points) To: has a malformed address SPAM: FROM_MALFORMED (0.3 points) Is this a problem with 1.4? Yes. Sample mail was attached to this bug... does it not do it for you? Should be fixed with the next build (1.4.5-3) I think. Can you check it when it's built? Will try as soon as 1.4.5-3.dwmw2.1 is built (without imap-over-ssh I can't actually get at my mailboxen and can't tell). Nope, still munged. Does the attached test message look correct when you view it? I tested it on 1.5.7 and it's still munged If you check the message as stored on disk, you'll see it was munged on its way in from your POP3 / IMAP / ??? server. I've tested this with Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 on a Gentoo Linux box, and it's definitely a bug in Evolution. When I check the message as stored on disk on my POP3 server, the X-Spam-Report header is well-formed. The copy Evolution stores on disk is munged. There are several open tickets for this in Ximian's Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=35681 FWIW, I've managed to reproduce this in evolution-2.0.0 Still happening in 2.1.5. See also http://david.woodhou.se/evo-ate-my-spam-report.jpeg although that's actually a screenshot of 2.0.something. The X-Spam-Report: header is basically unreadable due to Evolution's mangling of it. Upstream evolution hackers seem to claim that this is acceptable because it's syntactically equivalent after you mangle the whitespace. I'd like to hear what their usability people think of that assertion ;) Verified that the problem still exists in evolution-data-server-1.9.4-1.fc7. I'm resolving this bug as UPSTREAM and will update the status of the upstream bug [1] and continue to track the problem there. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235681 |