Bug 832587
Summary: | hunspell-en not required for Emacs 24 when it should be | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John D. Ramsdell <ramsdell> |
Component: | emacs | Assignee: | Karel Klíč <kklic> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 17 | CC: | jonathan.underwood, kklic, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-07-11 14:15:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John D. Ramsdell
2012-06-15 20:43:10 UTC
John, thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately I do not think that introducing the dependency on hunspell-en is a way to go. Emacs provides many features that interact with other programs and if we would go that path we would depend on gdb, texlive, version control programs etc. AFAIK programs using hunspell also do not depend on specific language dictionaries. I think "yum install hunspell-en" is the right way how to solve the issue these days. Let's consider adding hunspell-en as a dependency when RPM starts supporting optional dependencies ("Recommends"). I'm closing this issue for now. If you have some strong arguments for introducing the dependency, feel free to reopen so we can discuss them. |