Bug 834054

Summary:	Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Nathan Kinder <nkinder>
Component:	389-ds-base	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Sankar Ramalingam <sramling>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.4	CC:	jgalipea, mkubik, mreynolds
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	389-ds-base-1.2.11.12-1.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: some internal operations would update modifytimestamp, etc Consequence: modifytimestamp is not updated as expected. Fix: Added a new internal flag to skip the update of these attributes. Result: modifytimestamp bahavior is as expected.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 08:18:31 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nathan Kinder 2012-06-20 17:59:46 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/129

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249327

{{{
The directory server updates the modifyTimestamp on operations other than
Modify
operations.  See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4512.  However, attributes can
be
modified by operations other than Modify.  For example, with password policy
enabled, a Bind operation may update one or more operational attributes in a
user's entry.  Admin's do not expect modifyTimestamp to be updated under this
and similar circumstances.  See also
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=5040;page=2
}}}

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:17:30 UTC

This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:01:44 UTC

This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 3 Jenny Severance 2012-08-28 13:28:46 UTC

Automated regression tests covered in accPolicy suite, bug834054_01 - bug834054_11

Comment 5 Milan Kubík 2012-12-03 11:44:34 UTC

Acceptance tests run:

accPolicy run 	100% (41/41)

Marking bugzilla as verified.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:18:31 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0503.html