Bug 834054 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops
Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base (Show other bugs)
6.4
Unspecified Unspecified
medium Severity unspecified
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Rich Megginson
Sankar Ramalingam
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-06-20 13:59 EDT by Nathan Kinder
Modified: 2013-02-21 03:18 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.12-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: some internal operations would update modifytimestamp, etc Consequence: modifytimestamp is not updated as expected. Fix: Added a new internal flag to skip the update of these attributes. Result: modifytimestamp bahavior is as expected.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 03:18:31 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nathan Kinder 2012-06-20 13:59:46 EDT
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/129

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249327

{{{
The directory server updates the modifyTimestamp on operations other than
Modify
operations.  See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4512.  However, attributes can
be
modified by operations other than Modify.  For example, with password policy
enabled, a Bind operation may update one or more operational attributes in a
user's entry.  Admin's do not expect modifyTimestamp to be updated under this
and similar circumstances.  See also
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=5040;page=2
}}}
Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2012-07-10 02:17:30 EDT
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 2 RHEL Product and Program Management 2012-07-10 19:01:44 EDT
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
Comment 3 Jenny Galipeau 2012-08-28 09:28:46 EDT
Automated regression tests covered in accPolicy suite, bug834054_01 - bug834054_11
Comment 5 Milan Kubík 2012-12-03 06:44:34 EST
Acceptance tests run:

accPolicy run 	100% (41/41)

Marking bugzilla as verified.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 03:18:31 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0503.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.