RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 834054 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops
Summary: Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rich Megginson
QA Contact: Sankar Ramalingam
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-20 17:59 UTC by Nathan Kinder
Modified: 2020-09-13 19:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.12-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: some internal operations would update modifytimestamp, etc Consequence: modifytimestamp is not updated as expected. Fix: Added a new internal flag to skip the update of these attributes. Result: modifytimestamp bahavior is as expected.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 08:18:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 129 0 None None None 2020-09-13 19:54:00 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2013:0503 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: 389-ds-base security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2013-02-21 08:18:44 UTC

Description Nathan Kinder 2012-06-20 17:59:46 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/129

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249327

{{{
The directory server updates the modifyTimestamp on operations other than
Modify
operations.  See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4512.  However, attributes can
be
modified by operations other than Modify.  For example, with password policy
enabled, a Bind operation may update one or more operational attributes in a
user's entry.  Admin's do not expect modifyTimestamp to be updated under this
and similar circumstances.  See also
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=5040;page=2
}}}

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:17:30 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:01:44 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 3 Jenny Severance 2012-08-28 13:28:46 UTC
Automated regression tests covered in accPolicy suite, bug834054_01 - bug834054_11

Comment 5 Milan Kubík 2012-12-03 11:44:34 UTC
Acceptance tests run:

accPolicy run 	100% (41/41)

Marking bugzilla as verified.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:18:31 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0503.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.