Bug 837051

Summary:	Agent RPM - no agent rpm for rhel5
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	Armine Hovsepyan <ahovsepy>
Component:	Agent	Assignee:	RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	unspecified	CC:	hrupp, mfoley, snegrea
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-05-06 15:15:30 EDT	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	837381

Description Armine Hovsepyan 2012-07-02 11:35:27 EDT

Description of problem:
no agent rpm for rhel5 is ready.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
org.jboss.on-jboss-on-parent-3.1.0.GA-8

As a jon customer I want agent rpm installation file to be ready for rhel5.

As discussed, it will be ready for 3.1.1 version.

Comment 1 Charles Crouch 2012-07-03 12:00:45 EDT

Question from Larry/Deon: Can we use "noarch" to avoid creating to different 
sets of rpms for rhel5 vs 6?

Comment 3 Stefan Negrea 2012-07-05 14:11:38 EDT

All JON RPMs are created with noarch moniker. However, the current brew build target is setup for RHEL6. That means all the RPMs are signed for RHEL6 and they are build with a RHEL6 specific environment. 

RPMs that are unsigned or signed with the wrong certificate cannot be published through the errata process. That means the current RHEL6 RPMs cannot be published in RHEL5 channels. In order get RHEL5 RPMs, we would need to setup a RHEL5 brew tag and re-run the RPM packaging process.

Comment 4 John Sanda 2012-08-02 14:51:56 EDT

JON 3.1.1 ER1 build is available. Moving to ON_QA.

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=226942

Comment 6 Charles Crouch 2012-08-29 12:21:33 EDT

As per 8/20 triage marking as an RFE

Comment 7 Stefan Negrea 2014-05-06 15:15:30 EDT

Fixed a looong time ago!