Bug 841241

btw, I've got a i686 scratch build here: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1/

Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail

==== C/C++ ====
[x]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}

You can also remove the 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' from %install section.

[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro.
[x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Package is not relocatable.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.

gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgstbase-1.0.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgstcheck-1.0.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgstnet-1.0.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstcoreelements.so ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/gstreamer-1.0/gst-plugin-scanner ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgstcontroller-1.0.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gst-inspect-1.0 ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gst-launch-1.0 ['/usr/lib64']
gstreamer1.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gst-typefind-1.0 ['/usr/lib64']

see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath

[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[!]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define

Have you discussed this (gstreamer1) with gstreamer maintainers (seems you're not one of them) ?

(In reply to comment #3)
> Have you discussed this (gstreamer1) with gstreamer maintainers (seems
> you're not one of them) ?

Yes. I talked to hadess on the desktop-devel list & on irc.

Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1.spec
SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1/gstreamer1-0.11.92-2.fc18.src.rpm

* Fri Aug  3 2012 Brian Pepple <bpepple> - 0.11.92-2
- Use %%global instead of %%define macro.
- Remove rpath.

Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4356425

Ugh. SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1/gstreamer1-0.11.92-2.fc17.src.rpm

I don't see any other problem. APPROVED !

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gstreamer1
Short Description: GStreamer streaming media framework runtime
Owners: bpepple
Branches:
InitialCC: baz

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Dropped extraneous "baz".

(In reply to comment #9)
> Git done (by process-git-requests).
> 
> Dropped extraneous "baz".

Thanks. Forgot to drop that off when I copied over the template. ;-)

Imported and built. Thanks for the review, Jiri!

Is it possible to build this for F17 as well or is there any missing dependency?

(In reply to comment #12)
> Is it possible to build this for F17 as well or is there any missing
> dependency?

F17 should meet the dependencies for gst-1.0, but it's really only of interest for developers and not end-users, since no apps in F17 have been ported to the new api.

I'm working on pitivi, so it would be nice to have sytem wide packages. But most likely I can rebuild the package for f17 myself. Thanks.

I'm not sure from what Gstreamer1 package this error comes, but I get it when running the latest pitivi gstreamer1 branch:

(pitivi:22822): GStreamer-WARNING **: External plugin loader failed. This most likely means that the plugin loader helper binary was not found or could not be run. You might need to set the GST_PLUGIN_SCANNER environment variable if your setup is unusual. This should normally not be required though.

(In reply to comment #15)
> I'm not sure from what Gstreamer1 package this error comes, but I get it
> when running the latest pitivi gstreamer1 branch:
> 
> (pitivi:22822): GStreamer-WARNING **: External plugin loader failed. This
> most likely means that the plugin loader helper binary was not found or
> could not be run. You might need to set the GST_PLUGIN_SCANNER environment
> variable if your setup is unusual. This should normally not be required
> though.

Hmmm, not much information to debug with, but I'll dig into this further when I get back from vacation.