Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 841713
Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-good - GStreamer plugins with good code and licensing
Last modified: 2012-09-17 18:43:45 EDT
Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-good.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-good/gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.92-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: GStreamer Good Plugins is a collection of well-supported plugins of good quality and under the LGPL license. Fedora Account System Username: bpepple i686 build: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-good/
Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-good.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc17.src.rpm * Wed Aug 15 2012 Brian Pepple <bpepple@fedoraproject.org> - 0.11.93-1 - Update to 0.11.93. - Add patch to fix build with recent kernels, the v4l2_buffer input field was removed. Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4395423
Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ==== C/C++ ==== [-]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [-]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. ==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Buildroot is not present [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: MUST Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: MUST Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macro. [x]: MUST Package is named using only allowed ascii characters. [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. gstreamer1-plugins-good.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gstreamer1-plugins-good.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gstreamer1-plugins-good.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gstreamer1-plugins-good.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gstreamer1-plugins-good-extras.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GStreamer -> G Streamer, Streamer, Steamer gstreamer1-plugins-good-extras.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [!]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define After that, looks good to push. APPROVED
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gstreamer1-plugins-good Short Description: GStreamer plugins with good code and licensing Owners: bpepple Branches: f18 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11899/gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18,gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18,gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18
Package gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18 gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18 gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11899/gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18,gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18,gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Package gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93-2.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93-2.fc18 gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18 gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11899/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93-2.fc18,gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18,gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18,gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93-2.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.