Bug 848423

Summary:	Review Request: erlang-rtplib - Erlang RTP/RTCP codec library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, rbarlow
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	NotReady
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-01-13 21:45:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	652648, 823458, 845221, 876915
Bug Blocks:

Description Peter Lemenkov 2012-08-15 14:38:38 UTC

Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-rtplib.spec
SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-rtplib-0.5.18-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Erlang RTP/RTCP codec library.
Fedora Account System Username: peter

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2012-08-15 14:39:53 UTC

NotReady since not all dependent packages are available in Fedora.

Comment 2 Mario Blättermann 2012-10-13 19:31:43 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> NotReady since not all dependent packages are available in Fedora.

Which packages remain now as unavailable (in Rawhide)?

Comment 3 Mario Blättermann 2012-10-18 20:47:36 UTC

I tried to do a scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4605623

The errors from build.log are not to count... But seen the BR, all the needed stuff is available at least from Rawhide, even in the correct versions.

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2012-10-20 05:10:29 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> I tried to do a scratch build:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4605623
> 
> The errors from build.log are not to count... But seen the BR, all the
> needed stuff is available at least from Rawhide, even in the correct
> versions.

Mario, thanks for your attention to this. Right now I'm fully occupied by adding some essential functionality - that's why I'm responding so slowly.

From what I see it looks like something was changed in Opus bit-stream since the latest version I tested (which didn't have a stable API/ABI at that moment). I will investigate it.

Comment 5 Peter Lemenkov 2017-01-13 21:45:19 UTC

Unfortunately this library depends on patent-encumbered codecs. So I'm not going to proceed further. Maybe few years later...