Bug 848423 - Review Request: erlang-rtplib - Erlang RTP/RTCP codec library
Summary: Review Request: erlang-rtplib - Erlang RTP/RTCP codec library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: NotReady
Depends On: 652648 823458 845221 erlang-emmap
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-15 14:38 UTC by Peter Lemenkov
Modified: 2017-01-13 21:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-13 21:45:19 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Lemenkov 2012-08-15 14:38:38 UTC 
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-rtplib.spec
SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-rtplib-0.5.18-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Erlang RTP/RTCP codec library.
Fedora Account System Username: peter
Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2012-08-15 14:39:53 UTC 
NotReady since not all dependent packages are available in Fedora.
Comment 2 Mario Blättermann 2012-10-13 19:31:43 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> NotReady since not all dependent packages are available in Fedora.

Which packages remain now as unavailable (in Rawhide)?
Comment 3 Mario Blättermann 2012-10-18 20:47:36 UTC 
I tried to do a scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4605623

The errors from build.log are not to count... But seen the BR, all the needed stuff is available at least from Rawhide, even in the correct versions.
Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2012-10-20 05:10:29 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> I tried to do a scratch build:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4605623
> 
> The errors from build.log are not to count... But seen the BR, all the
> needed stuff is available at least from Rawhide, even in the correct
> versions.

Mario, thanks for your attention to this. Right now I'm fully occupied by adding some essential functionality - that's why I'm responding so slowly.

From what I see it looks like something was changed in Opus bit-stream since the latest version I tested (which didn't have a stable API/ABI at that moment). I will investigate it.
Comment 5 Peter Lemenkov 2017-01-13 21:45:19 UTC 
Unfortunately this library depends on patent-encumbered codecs. So I'm not going to proceed further. Maybe few years later...
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.