Bug 852332

Summary:	%postun(wdaemon-0.17-2.el6.*) scriptlet failed
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Component:	wdaemon	Assignee:	Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3	CC:	ljozsa, pholica
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	wdaemon-0.17-5.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 07:55:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	841211

Description Tomas Pelka 2012-08-28 08:29:31 UTC

Description of problem:
Output from RPM Command:
warning: %postun(wdaemon-0.17-2.el6.*) scriptlet failed, exit status 1

http://nest.test.redhat.com/mnt/qa/scratch/i386-6c-m1/2012:13699/tps/tps-rpmtest.log

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
wdaemon-0.17-2.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
reproduced on all arches

Comment 1 Peter Hutterer 2012-08-28 22:41:55 UTC

this should be fixed with wdaemon-0.17-5, can you please re-check? note that it fails on uninstalling the old package (0.17-2), but shouldn't fail with -5.

Comment 2 Tomas Pelka 2012-09-04 14:15:54 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> this should be fixed with wdaemon-0.17-5, can you please re-check? note that
> it fails on uninstalling the old package (0.17-2), but shouldn't fail with
> -5.

I can confirm it is fixed, acking.

Comment 3 Peter Hutterer 2012-10-11 02:45:42 UTC

MODIFIED

wdaemon-0.17-5.el6 is available in brew

Comment 5 Peter Hutterer 2012-11-13 10:40:19 UTC

*** Bug 875703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 07:55:44 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0293.html