Bug 853826

Summary: Section 3.1 - suggest adding "Less Down Time" verbiage
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Documentation Reporter: Tim Kramer <joat>
Component: virtualization-getting-started-guideAssignee: Dayle Parker <dayleparker>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Docs QA <docs-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: develCC: docs, sradvan, zach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-09-16 15:27:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tim Kramer 2012-09-03 05:10:25 UTC 
Description of problem:  In Section 3.1, of the Draft Virtualization Guide for Fedora 18, suggest adding something similar to the following:

"Less Down Time
  VMs can be copied or moved, configuration changes can be validated, and software updates can be tested without impacting the users' online experience."

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 18


How reproducible:  Not a fault.


Steps to Reproduce:  N/A
  
Actual results: N/A

Expected results: N/A

Additional info:
Comment 1 Tim Kramer 2012-09-03 05:16:56 UTC 
My apologies, that was the Fedora 18 Virtualization Getting Started Guide.
Comment 2 Scott Radvan 2012-09-04 02:57:04 UTC 
changing component to virtualization-getting-started-guide based on comment 1
Comment 3 Dayle Parker 2012-09-06 05:31:23 UTC 
Great suggestion, thanks for that. :)

Updated Chapter 3: Advantages to include this (in its own heading) to highlight this point, which is otherwise :

3.4. Flexibility
Virtualization provides greater flexibility for managing systems. Virtual machines can be copied or moved to test software updates and validate configuration changes, without impacting other systems. Because each of the virtualized systems are completely separate to each other, one system's downtime will not affect any others. 

Please let me know if this solution is sufficient.
Comment 4 Dayle Parker 2012-09-06 05:36:34 UTC 
Hi QA, 

Please verify this change.

Thanks so much,
Dayle
Comment 5 Tim Kramer 2012-09-16 15:27:22 UTC 
Apologies for the delay.  Still learning Bugzilla.