Bug 855734

Summary:	[RFE] add configuration support for NFSv4 in TUI menus
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Haim <hateya>
Component:	ovirt-node	Assignee:	Joey Boggs <jboggs>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3	CC:	abaron, acathrow, achan, bsarathy, cpelland, cshao, dyasny, gouyang, iheim, jboggs, leiwang, mburns, ovirt-maint, ycui, yeylon, ykaul
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ovirt-node-2.5.0-6.el6	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Because of new support for advanced NFS options, users may choose the NFS server version for their configuration. The TUI menu on remote storage should now show the option to add an NFSv4 domain.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-28 16:38:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Haim 2012-09-10 06:52:13 UTC

Description of problem:

both engine and vdsm are now support advanced NFS options which defines the way mount options are sent to vds (client), and also, user may chose NFS server version he works with, by default, its NFS v4, which requires additional configuration on client side (rhev-h), we need to add support to ease up the configuration process (since we don't expect users will edit /etc/idmapd.conf and persist the file afterwards).

desired configuration are:

/etc/idmapd.conf  --> should include the following line:

Domain = redhat.com (for example)

/etc/init.d/rpcidmapd restart 

nfsidmap -c

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-28 16:38:40 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0556.html