Bug 856525
Summary: | mlogc is missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Ronny Buchmann <ronny-rhbugzilla> |
Component: | mod_security | Assignee: | Othman Madjoudj <athmanem> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | el6 | CC: | athmanem, pvrabec |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-20 15:26:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ronny Buchmann
2012-09-12 08:35:15 UTC
mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6 A new build with mlogc sub-package will be pushed to epel-testing (mod_security-2.6.7-2). EPEL 5 will follow soon. mod_security-2.6.7-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_security-2.6.7-2.el5 mlogc as a separate package is fine for me, but it doesn't provide a seamless update (which is broken anyway, due to mod_security_crs lingering in testing). I think the right way would be to have mod_security require mlogc and mod_security_crs for EPEL Package mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-12872/mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). (In reply to comment #4) > mlogc as a separate package is fine for me, but it doesn't provide a > seamless update (which is broken anyway, due to mod_security_crs lingering > in testing). > > I think the right way would be to have mod_security require mlogc and > mod_security_crs for EPEL mlogc should be an optional package, because not everyone is deploying mod_security with it, there's other way to do mod_security logs analysis (some HIDS - Host-based intrusion detection system - can alert/block web attacks through mod_security audit log). mod_security-2.6.7-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |