mlogc is missing in mod_security-2.6.7-1. This was included in mod_security-2.5.12. This breaks existing installations using mlogc. Applies also to el5 version.
mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6
A new build with mlogc sub-package will be pushed to epel-testing (mod_security-2.6.7-2). EPEL 5 will follow soon.
mod_security-2.6.7-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_security-2.6.7-2.el5
mlogc as a separate package is fine for me, but it doesn't provide a seamless update (which is broken anyway, due to mod_security_crs lingering in testing). I think the right way would be to have mod_security require mlogc and mod_security_crs for EPEL
Package mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-12872/mod_security-2.6.7-2.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
(In reply to comment #4) > mlogc as a separate package is fine for me, but it doesn't provide a > seamless update (which is broken anyway, due to mod_security_crs lingering > in testing). > > I think the right way would be to have mod_security require mlogc and > mod_security_crs for EPEL mlogc should be an optional package, because not everyone is deploying mod_security with it, there's other way to do mod_security logs analysis (some HIDS - Host-based intrusion detection system - can alert/block web attacks through mod_security audit log).
mod_security-2.6.7-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.