Bug 856673

Summary:	Add sos to Red Hat Storage
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Scott Haines <shaines>
Component:	sos	Assignee:	Raghavendra Bhat <rabhat>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Sachidananda Urs <surs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	2.0	CC:	amarts, andriusb, atowns, bmr, bturner, grajaiya, rhs-bugs, sac, shaines, ujjwala, vbellur, vinaraya
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sos-2.2-17.1.el6rhs.noarch.rpm	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	855265	Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-11-12 18:47:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	855265
Bug Blocks:

Comment 4 Amar Tumballi 2012-10-15 11:31:29 UTC

check the sos version on the machine, and it should have rhs in it to confirm the different RPM in our child channel.

changelog in rpm:

-----
Changelog:
* Tue Sep 11 2012 Amar Tumballi <atumball> = 2.2-17.el6rhs.1
- Change gluster.py to send signal to glusterfs process
   directly instead of 'gluster volume status' command.
   Resolves: bz851175
- Capture statedump files in sosreport

-----

Comment 5 Raghavendra Bhat 2012-10-15 12:43:50 UTC

the changes that have been made to sosreport gluster plugin are

* send SIGUSR1 signal to all the glusterfs processes instead of volume statedump or volume status cli command.(with SIGUSR1, from all the glusterfs processes including the mount points, self-heal daemon, nfs server the statedump information is received).

* All the statedump information is collected in the sosreport.

Comment 6 Bryn M. Reeves 2012-10-15 12:50:55 UTC

Please could someone post the patches for this feature to the sos-devel mailing list for review. As we discussed previously we do not want sos in RHS to diverge from upstream and it's important that the review starts early to ensure that we don't end up having to back things out at a later stage.

Comment 7 Sachidananda Urs 2012-10-16 09:49:39 UTC

I guess this is not part of update 3. I still see glusterdumps not being part of the archive.

Comment 8 Amar Tumballi 2012-10-16 09:52:05 UTC

http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/sos/commit/?h=rhs-2.0-rhel-6&id=705f21a7394717d810cca63573cb0b815abd54fa

will make sure we post all the patches to sos-devel@ ML in future.

Comment 9 Amar Tumballi 2012-10-16 09:53:25 UTC

@Sac (for comment #7) did you do a yum upgrade of sos package? sos is a different RPM, and not part of glusterfs rpm set... Refer to one of the mail I have sent to storage-qa on sos package.

Comment 10 Sachidananda Urs 2012-10-16 09:59:09 UTC

Amar, yes I had done yum update before this. Or is it that I download and sosreport separately? Do we have the sosreport version so that I can cross check. I am running:


[root@rhs-client19 ~]# sosreport -v

sosreport (version 2.2)

Comment 11 Sachidananda Urs 2012-10-17 07:23:09 UTC

Verified with RPM: http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/sos/2.2/17.1.el6rhs/noarch/sos-2.2-17.1.el6rhs.noarch.rpm

With the above RPM update sosreport now places the glusterdumps in sosreport archive under directory tmp/ in the archive.

Comment 13 Sachidananda Urs 2012-10-17 11:04:56 UTC

I have opened another bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867346) to track where the glusterdump files go into. We will keep this bug in verified state.

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2012-11-12 18:47:20 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1456.html