Bug 857440 (kio-upnp-ms)
Summary: | Review Request: kio-upnp-ms - UPnP mediaserver kio slave | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jan Grulich <jgrulich> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dan.mashal, jgrulich, kevin, nlminhtl, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jgrulich:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-24 17:33:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 656997 |
Description
Rex Dieter
2012-09-14 12:44:01 UTC
I can't see any problem from my point of view. Rpmlint and fedora-review didn't show any serious problems so I set fedora-review flag to +. So, as for kio_mtp, same question here: Shouldn't this be named kio_upnp_ms? I wish we had an agreed-on consistent naming convention for kio_* and kcm_* packages, we're having this discussion for every single package (and naming is currently not consistent). :-( New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: kio-upnp-ms Short Description: UPnP mediaserver kio slave Owners: rdieter jgrulich Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). imported |