Bug 858734

Summary: storage test should use udev
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program Reporter: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Component: Test Suite (tests)Assignee: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.6.4CC: czhang, pbenas, rlandry
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-01 18:21:23 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
storage test patch to use udev for test planning (device detection) none

Description Greg Nichols 2012-09-19 14:20:49 UTC 
Description of problem:

The storage test switched from HAL to UDisks in v7 1.6.4.   It seems that this may not be the best approach, as UDisks is already being replaced with UDisks2 in Fedora and RHEL7.   While both UDisks and UDisks2 can both be installed, it would be better not to have a dependancy on these packages.

udev appears sufficent for hardware detection, and seems more stable across Fedora and RHEL releases.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v7 1.6.4 R2
Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2012-09-19 14:24:42 UTC 
Created attachment 614405 [details]
storage test patch to use udev for test planning (device detection)

Tested on RHEL7.   The rpm dependancy on udisks should also be removed from v7's rpm spec.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-01 18:21:23 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0222.html