Bug 858734 - storage test should use udev
Summary: storage test should use udev
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Hardware Certification Program
Classification: Retired
Component: Test Suite (tests)
Version: 1.6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Greg Nichols
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-09-19 14:20 UTC by Greg Nichols
Modified: 2013-02-01 18:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-01 18:21:23 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
storage test patch to use udev for test planning (device detection) (2.12 KB, patch)
2012-09-19 14:24 UTC, Greg Nichols 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0222 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE v7 bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-01 23:18:53 UTC

Description Greg Nichols 2012-09-19 14:20:49 UTC 
Description of problem:

The storage test switched from HAL to UDisks in v7 1.6.4.   It seems that this may not be the best approach, as UDisks is already being replaced with UDisks2 in Fedora and RHEL7.   While both UDisks and UDisks2 can both be installed, it would be better not to have a dependancy on these packages.

udev appears sufficent for hardware detection, and seems more stable across Fedora and RHEL releases.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v7 1.6.4 R2
Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2012-09-19 14:24:42 UTC 
Created attachment 614405 [details]
storage test patch to use udev for test planning (device detection)

Tested on RHEL7.   The rpm dependancy on udisks should also be removed from v7's rpm spec.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-01 18:21:23 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0222.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.