Bug 8682
Summary: | Missing translating files | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Enrico Scholz <rh-bugzilla> | ||||
Component: | tetex | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 1.0 | CC: | bero | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2001-04-11 16:13:20 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Enrico Scholz
2000-01-20 22:22:21 UTC
Created attachment 72 [details]
Diff against texinfo-4.0-2 spec-file
Thanks - I've fixed the info-stnd stuff (somewhat different from what you suggested though). As for the txi stuff, the reason why they aren't included is the conflict with tetex; I'd rather have tetex updated with the current files from texinfo than moving them out of tetex and putting them into texinfo. Assigning this to the owner of tetex... Just so I'm absolutely clear: which files exactly need updating? I think it's /usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/txi-*.tex /usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/texinfo.tex with additional files: /usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/epsf.tex /usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/config/texinfo.cnf Is that right? Yes; the first two files are in current tetex already. The location of 'texinfo.cnf' is variable as long it is under the texmf-root and has been seen by the 'texhash' command. I have choosen the 'config' subdir because the other TeX modules are using it also. Okay, in fact it looks like just updating the texinfo in the tetex SRPM to the current texinfo (as well as adding those two files to the manifest) will fix this. If the texinfo.cnf is left out, is that a huge problem? I think that texinfo rather than tetex should provide that, if at all. I would like to see it as a template where the user can make its changes. Because the documentation does not say something about the place/directory where this file should be located, a standard texinfo.cnf in the distribution would give an hint where it can be expected on a RH system. But if it does not fit into current packages, you can omit it... Now that I look more closely at this, these seem up to date already: /usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/txi-*.tex /usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/texinfo.tex Fixed in tetex-1.0.7-16. |