Bug 868325
Summary: | Review Request: expatpp - A tiny OO C++ wrapper around expat | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mario Ceresa <mrceresa> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | lemenkov, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lemenkov:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-11-22 08:40:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 567086 |
Description
Mario Ceresa
2012-10-19 14:09:37 UTC
Builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4607212 I'll review it. New srpm which fixes the name of the license, the comments to regenerate the tarball from the svn and the docs http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/expatpp-0.6-20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc17.src.rpm Maybe I have to call it expatpp-0-20121019r6.fc17.src.rpm? Few notes: * Please specify a svn revision explicitly (instead of exporting HEAD) * Relese should be from 1.20121019gitd8c1bf8%{?dist} Otherwise looks good. REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is silent sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/expatpp-* ../SRPMS/expatpp-0.6-20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc19.src.rpm expatpp.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US schemas -> schema, sachems, schemes ^^^ false positive expatpp-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation ^^^ sad but true. expatpp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US schemas -> schema, sachems, schemes ^^^ false positive expatpp.src:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 2) ^^^ cosmetic. Please fix in the mean time. expatpp.src: W: file-size-mismatch expatpp.tar.bz2 = 10814, http://sourceforge.net/projects/expatpp/files/expatpp.tar.bz2 = 22116 ^^^ since we don't use the tarball from SF in favor of autogenerated one then just shorted Source1 to expatpp.tar.bz2 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Mozilla Public License 1.1, as stated at the SF's page). 0 No licensing info provided in tarball. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. + The package stores shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths, and it calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. 0 The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are stored in a -devel package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) is(are) stored in a -devel package. + The -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Ok, please address the issues noted above and I'll finish review. All done: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc17.src.rpm + Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4634028 I don's see any other issues so this package is APPROVED. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: expatpp Short Description: A tiny OO C++ wrapper around expat Owners: mrceresa Branches: f17 f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: peter Git done (by process-git-requests). expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc17 expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc18 expatpp-0-1.20121019gitd8c1bf8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. |