Bug 871604
| Summary: | Review Request: fedup - fedora upgrade tool | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Will Woods <wwoods> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Kevin Fenzi <kevin> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jreznik, notting, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-11-01 15:31:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Will Woods
2012-10-30 20:31:58 UTC
I'll go ahead and review this. Look for a full review in a few. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: No checksum, but diff of checkout matches unpacked tar.xz OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Would be good to include commands needed to checkout source if there's not a direct download link: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control A direct Source0 link would be nice if possible. 2. rpmlint says: fedup.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C the Fedora Upgrade tool Change the 'to' to 'To' ? fedup.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fedup-cli man page would be nice, but of course not required. fedup.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %files fedup.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir} fedup.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir} fedup.src: W: invalid-url Source0: fedup-0.7.tar.xz Remove % from those commented lines, or use %% None of those are blockers. If you could address them before import that would be great. Otherwise, this package is APPROVED. To save some time and allow for bugs to start being reported... New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: fedup Short Description: Fedora Upgrade tool Owners: wwoods Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). |