Bug 871604 - Review Request: fedup - fedora upgrade tool
Summary: Review Request: fedup - fedora upgrade tool
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kevin Fenzi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-30 20:31 UTC by Will Woods
Modified: 2012-11-01 15:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-01 15:31:27 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kevin: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Will Woods 2012-10-30 20:31:58 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/blob/master/fedup.spec
SRPM URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/fedup/fedup-0.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description: fedup is the Fedora Upgrade tool.
Fedora Account System Username: wwoods

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2012-10-30 20:36:31 UTC
I'll go ahead and review this. Look for a full review in a few.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2012-10-30 21:02:00 UTC
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
No checksum, but diff of checkout matches unpacked tar.xz

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. Would be good to include commands needed to checkout source if there's 
not a direct download link: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
A direct Source0 link would be nice if possible. 

2. rpmlint says: 

fedup.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C the Fedora Upgrade tool

Change the 'to' to 'To' ?

fedup.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fedup-cli

man page would be nice, but of course not required. 

fedup.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %files
fedup.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir}
fedup.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
fedup.src: W: invalid-url Source0: fedup-0.7.tar.xz

Remove % from those commented lines, or use %%

None of those are blockers. If you could address them before import that would 
be great. Otherwise, this package is APPROVED.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2012-10-31 19:53:09 UTC
To save some time and allow for bugs to start being reported... 

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: fedup
Short Description: Fedora Upgrade tool
Owners: wwoods
Branches: f17 f18
InitialCC:

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2012-11-01 02:07:26 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.