Bug 873083
| Summary: | "fedup --network 18" error message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Component: | fedup | Assignee: | Will Woods <wwoods> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 17 | CC: | tflink, wwoods |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-11-05 15:23:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Yeah, the error message isn't incredibly friendly but it's saying that the command isn't properly formed. At the moment, --instrepo is required for fedup to run and it needs to point to a repo with a kernel and upgrade.img in the .treeinfo. I have a side repo like that set up for testing: http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/fedup/f18-upgrade/<arch> Make sure that you replace <arch> with the arch you're using (i386, x86_64) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 872899 *** |
Description of problem: This is probably because the infrastructure for upgrades is not in place yet but current the error message from "fedup --network 18" is not too friendly... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.7-1.fc17 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run "fedup --network 18" Actual results: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/bin/fedup-cli", line 253, in <module> args = parse_args() File "/bin/fedup-cli", line 179, in parse_args if '://' in args.instrepo: TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable Expected results: Error message explaining no available repo?