Bug 873693

Summary: not clear page when you have to reclaim space on disk
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: anaconda-maint-list, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-06 09:51:11 EST Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Description Flags
space reclamation page during install none

Description Gianluca Cecchi 2012-11-06 09:02:26 EST
Created attachment 639390 [details]
space reclamation page during install

Description of problem:
If you have to overwrite a previous install or in general if the disk is not empty it is not sufficiently clear how to choose option

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install from iso (I used netinst.iso from f18 TC7)
2. land to the section regarding hard disk target install
3. try to reclaim space
Actual results:
It is not so clear in my opinion (at list it took half a minute to me to
understand... forgive me ;-) to click on right most column of each line and
see a drop down list with "preserve, reclaim, delete".

Expected results:
It could be better to put an arrow in the page or to explain better in the text placed before the window

Additional info:

See the attaced screenshot of a pre-instaled F17 vm where I run the netinst.iso
for trying install of f18 tc7.

What do you think?
Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2012-11-06 09:51:11 EST
Yes, agreed, we definitely want an arrow to appear in that drop down.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 866209 ***