Bug 88048

Summary:	Missing line in drivers/pci/pci.ids
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1	Reporter:	Glen A. Foster <glen.foster>
Component:	pciutils	Assignee:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	2.1	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ia64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-04-04 23:42:35 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 21:26:58 UTC

Description of problem: Running "lspci" on my HP i2000 (Itanium-1, a "big sur" 
class system), I find a device that's unknown.  HP would really like to have 
this fixed since this is a core hardware device for this system.

The line:

04:14.1 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 84ea

... comes from missing this line:

84ea  460GX - 84460GX AGP Bridge (GXB function 1)

in "drivers/pci/pci.ids".  As verified on the e.25 kernel, that's the only 
obvious 460GX device ID they're missing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -q kernel pciutils
kernel-2.4.18-e.27
pciutils-2.1.8-26

How reproducible: 100% (always)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install on an HP i2000
2. Login as root
3. run "lspci | grep -i unknown"

Actual results:
# lspci | grep -i unknown
04:14.1 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 84ea

Expected results:
No "unknown" devices listed.

Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 21:27:49 UTC

... if anaconda is wrong (probably is), please forward to whomever.  I started 
with anaconda, BTW, because it finds PCI devices just like lspci.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-04-04 22:54:06 UTC

This does not affect functionality in any way.

Comment 3 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 22:57:39 UTC

Please re-consider.  It looks bad for HP customers to have anything reported by 
Red Hat Linux saying "I don't know what this hardware is".  It's a one-line 
patch and I've provided the information necessary.

Comment 4 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 23:00:20 UTC

... or at least mark it DEFERRED instead WONTFIX?

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-04-04 23:42:35 UTC

Deferred sounds ok... it should be fine in AS3.