|Summary:||Missing line in drivers/pci/pci.ids|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1||Reporter:||Glen A. Foster <glen.foster>|
|Component:||pciutils||Assignee:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Status:||CLOSED DEFERRED||QA Contact:||Ben Levenson <benl>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2003-04-04 23:42:35 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 21:26:58 UTC
Description of problem: Running "lspci" on my HP i2000 (Itanium-1, a "big sur" class system), I find a device that's unknown. HP would really like to have this fixed since this is a core hardware device for this system. The line: 04:14.1 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 84ea ... comes from missing this line: 84ea 460GX - 84460GX AGP Bridge (GXB function 1) in "drivers/pci/pci.ids". As verified on the e.25 kernel, that's the only obvious 460GX device ID they're missing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -q kernel pciutils kernel-2.4.18-e.27 pciutils-2.1.8-26 How reproducible: 100% (always) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install on an HP i2000 2. Login as root 3. run "lspci | grep -i unknown" Actual results: # lspci | grep -i unknown 04:14.1 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 84ea Expected results: No "unknown" devices listed.
Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 21:27:49 UTC
... if anaconda is wrong (probably is), please forward to whomever. I started with anaconda, BTW, because it finds PCI devices just like lspci.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-04-04 22:54:06 UTC
This does not affect functionality in any way.
Comment 3 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 22:57:39 UTC
Please re-consider. It looks bad for HP customers to have anything reported by Red Hat Linux saying "I don't know what this hardware is". It's a one-line patch and I've provided the information necessary.
Comment 4 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 23:00:20 UTC
... or at least mark it DEFERRED instead WONTFIX?
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-04-04 23:42:35 UTC
Deferred sounds ok... it should be fine in AS3.