Bug 88048 - Missing line in drivers/pci/pci.ids
Missing line in drivers/pci/pci.ids
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pciutils (Show other bugs)
2.1
ia64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Ben Levenson
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-04-04 16:26 EST by Glen A. Foster
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:35 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-04-04 18:42:35 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 16:26:58 EST
Description of problem: Running "lspci" on my HP i2000 (Itanium-1, a "big sur" 
class system), I find a device that's unknown.  HP would really like to have 
this fixed since this is a core hardware device for this system.

The line:

04:14.1 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 84ea

... comes from missing this line:

84ea  460GX - 84460GX AGP Bridge (GXB function 1)

in "drivers/pci/pci.ids".  As verified on the e.25 kernel, that's the only 
obvious 460GX device ID they're missing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -q kernel pciutils
kernel-2.4.18-e.27
pciutils-2.1.8-26

How reproducible: 100% (always)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install on an HP i2000
2. Login as root
3. run "lspci | grep -i unknown"

Actual results:
# lspci | grep -i unknown
04:14.1 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 84ea

Expected results:
No "unknown" devices listed.
Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 16:27:49 EST
... if anaconda is wrong (probably is), please forward to whomever.  I started 
with anaconda, BTW, because it finds PCI devices just like lspci.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-04-04 17:54:06 EST
This does not affect functionality in any way.
Comment 3 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 17:57:39 EST
Please re-consider.  It looks bad for HP customers to have anything reported by 
Red Hat Linux saying "I don't know what this hardware is".  It's a one-line 
patch and I've provided the information necessary.
Comment 4 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 18:00:20 EST
... or at least mark it DEFERRED instead WONTFIX?
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-04-04 18:42:35 EST
Deferred sounds ok... it should be fine in AS3.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.