Bug 882268
Summary: | vdsClient reports still old data after upgrade to rhevm-guest-agent on RHEL6 32bit | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Jiri Belka <jbelka> |
Component: | ovirt-guest-agent | Assignee: | Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] <vfeenstr> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jiri Belka <jbelka> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.1.0 | CC: | dyasny, ghammer, iheim, michal.skrivanek, mkenneth, sgrinber, vfeenstr |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.2.0 | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | virt | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Cause:
A backward compatibility fix previously reported the 'rhev-agent' package to be installed as well.
Consequence:
Misinformation reported in the RHEVM WebAdmin portal under the installed applications.
Fix:
The old package is no longer reported.
Result:
The misleading information is no longer shown in the RHEVM WebAdmin portal
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-06-10 20:12:14 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 915537 |
Description
Jiri Belka
2012-11-30 14:31:48 UTC
WAP = web admin portal, it means "bad" data are even in web admin portal. Same on x86_64. this is intentional. waiting on gal/barak to comment why and if it's still needed It was needed in order to support old GUI. I don't know what is the logic in the new GUI. OK, sf4 & rhevm-guest-agent-common-1.0.7-4.el6ev.noarch. This bug is currently attached to errata RHEA-2013:14354. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag. Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information: * Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. * Consequence: What happens when the bug presents. * Fix: What was done to fix the bug. * Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore') Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug. For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes Thanks in advance. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0914.html |