Bug 88295
Summary: | Please include Bugzilla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Tad Marko <tad> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | ondrej, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-04-08 23:17:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tad Marko
2003-04-08 17:23:55 UTC
Considering the extensive local customization generally done on bugzilla, and the occasional security update required, I'm not certain that the benefits of shipping bugzilla would offset the development costs. *** Bug 135546 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I don't get it, there are at least two RPM based distributions that come with bugzilla. I'm missing bugzilla much more than multimedia support. |