Bug 883585

Summary: ricci/ccs/ccs_sync: man pages have executable flags set
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Pokorný [poki] <jpokorny>
Component: ricciAssignee: Chris Feist <cfeist>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.3CC: cluster-maint, fdinitto, lnovich, rsteiger, slevine
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ricci-0.16.2-65.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 883804 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 21:52:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Pokorný [poki] 2012-12-04 22:43:50 UTC
# ls -l /usr/share/man/man8/{ricci,ccs,ccs_sync}.8.gz
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2662 May  2  2012 /usr/share/man/man8/ccs.8.gz
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  485 Oct 12 22:02 /usr/share/man/man8/ccs_sync.8.gz
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  426 Oct 12 22:02 /usr/share/man/man8/ricci.8.gz

# rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man8/{ricci,ccs,ccs_sync}.8.gz
ricci-0.16.2-56.el6.x86_64
ccs-0.16.2-55.el6.x86_64
ricci-0.16.2-56.el6.x86_64

Comment 9 Chris Feist 2013-08-08 22:06:01 UTC
After scratch build:
[root@ask-02 ~]# rpm -q ccs ricci
ccs-0.16.2-65.el6.x86_64
ricci-0.16.2-65.el6.x86_64
[root@ask-02 ~]# ls -l /usr/share/man/man8/{ricci,ccs,ccs_sync}.8.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2677 Aug  8 16:58 /usr/share/man/man8/ccs.8.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  485 Aug  8 16:58 /usr/share/man/man8/ccs_sync.8.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  426 Aug  8 16:58 /usr/share/man/man8/ricci.8.gz
[root@ask-02 ~]#

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 21:52:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1673.html