Bug 892703

Summary: Bridge member is pointing to wrong bridge with biosdevname devices
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch>
Component: kexec-toolsAssignee: Dave Young <ruyang>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Guangze Bai <gbai>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.4CC: bhe, gbai, hadong, jgalipea, mburns, qcai, ruyang, tlavigne, yshao
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: kexec-tools-2.0.0-258.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 894951 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 07:49:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 886782, 894951, 902691    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch v5 none

Description Fabian Deutsch 2013-01-07 16:16:42 UTC 
Description of problem:
A bisodevname named NIC em1 (which is a member of brem1) get's correctly mapped to eth0 (so the rename/mapping succeeds), additionally the BRIDGE key in the ifcfg is adjusted to point to breth1.
But the bridge brem1 is not mapped to breth0, but keeps it's name brem1. This breaks the bridge configuration in the kdump kernel, as the nic is now a slave of the not existing bridge.
I don't know why the BRIDGE entry in the NICs ifcfg was changed.

There was a bug also related to bridges not to long ago bug #821930 but this seems to be different ans it's related to the ifnames in the cfg files.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
See bug #886782
Comment 18 Dave Young 2013-01-18 02:20:59 UTC 
Created attachment 681968 [details]
patch v5
Comment 22 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 07:49:48 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0281.html