Bug 903131

Summary: 0b drives without label are visible in anaconda
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Pavel Holica <pholica>
Component: python-blivetAssignee: Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: bruno, ljozsa, mkovarik, pholica, pkotvan
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-blivet-0.61.0.2-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 14:05:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 782468, 920029    
Attachments:
Description Flags
anaconda.log
none
anaconda-yum.conf
none
ifcfg.log
none
packaging.log
none
program.log
none
storage.log
none
syslog
none
X.log
none
lsblk_and_list-harddrives.png
none
0b devices in custom partitioning
none
anaconda-tb after removing 0b device
none
anaconda-tb none

Comment 1 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:44:24 UTC
Created attachment 685773 [details]
anaconda.log

Comment 2 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:45:05 UTC
Created attachment 685774 [details]
anaconda-yum.conf

Comment 3 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:45:25 UTC
Created attachment 685775 [details]
ifcfg.log

Comment 4 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:46:01 UTC
Created attachment 685776 [details]
packaging.log

Comment 5 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:46:22 UTC
Created attachment 685777 [details]
program.log

Comment 6 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:49:10 UTC
Created attachment 685779 [details]
storage.log

Comment 7 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:49:40 UTC
Created attachment 685780 [details]
syslog

Comment 8 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:50:00 UTC
Created attachment 685782 [details]
X.log

Comment 9 Pavel Holica 2013-01-23 09:55:48 UTC
Created attachment 685784 [details]
lsblk_and_list-harddrives.png

Attaching also outputs of lsblk and list-harddrives commands.

Comment 10 Chris Lumens 2013-01-23 15:05:21 UTC
I suppose they could be live-related.  Those are the only things in your storage.log I see as reporting 0 size,  but I would have thought we'd run into those problems already.  If you hover the mouse over them, do you get any more identifying information?

Comment 11 Pavel Holica 2013-01-29 09:40:44 UTC
Those may be 2 drives that are marked in BIOS/UEFI as Virtual floppy and Virtual CD-ROM. Those are not visible by anaconda on the same system in RHEL-6 anaconda.

On hover those drives show:
sda | 20080519
sda | 20080519

Comment 12 Chris Lumens 2013-01-31 15:01:23 UTC
Well, I've got a commit for this pushed for anaconda-19.3.  Unfortunately those builds are not being pulled into RHEL7 at the moment, for understandable reasons.  How do you want to handle the resolution?

Comment 13 Pavel Holica 2013-01-31 15:20:13 UTC
anaconda-19 is ok, we can have this bug in alpha3 since it doesn't block anything.

I still can test the fix however on newer anaconda either on Fedora or using internal anaconda builds.

Comment 14 Michal Kovarik 2013-11-01 11:36:41 UTC
0b drives are still visible in custom partitioning. There are visible in UNKNOWN system. If I try to delete this 0b UNKNOWN drive, bug 960794 is appeared.

Comment 15 Chris Lumens 2013-11-01 14:04:01 UTC
Please, when you reopen a bug, attach details - log files, pictures, etc.

Comment 16 Michal Kovarik 2013-11-01 14:24:08 UTC
Created attachment 818298 [details]
0b devices in custom partitioning

Comment 17 Michal Kovarik 2013-11-01 14:24:46 UTC
Created attachment 818299 [details]
anaconda-tb after removing 0b device

Comment 18 Chris Lumens 2013-12-18 19:15:18 UTC
Do you remember what steps you took?  Did the disks in question appear on the first storage screen you saw?  If not, did they just later appear on custom storage, or did you do something special to cause that to happen?

Comment 19 Michal Kovarik 2014-01-02 09:43:57 UTC
0b devices are showed on custom storage (see attachment 818298 [details]), they are not showed on first storage screen. These 0b devices are card readers (every supported card type is showed as 0b device, except SD reader)

Comment 21 Ľuboš Kardoš 2014-01-30 14:25:32 UTC
Created attachment 857511 [details]
anaconda-tb

Comment 22 Ľuboš Kardoš 2014-01-30 14:29:17 UTC
Issue as is described in comment 19 is also in anaconda-19.31.54-1. Traceback (attachment 857511 [details]) is from attempt to remove this 0b device.

Comment 24 Chris Lumens 2014-02-07 21:14:52 UTC
*** Bug 1056568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 25 Chris Lumens 2014-02-12 20:18:41 UTC
I am going to need actual, physical, in-person hardware to work on this.  I'll try to find some around here but if anyone knows of any in Westford, that would be very helpful.

Comment 26 Pavel Holica 2014-02-24 12:43:06 UTC
I'm not aware of any system in westford, but it seems, that any system with non-SD card reader should be sufficient.
We have such system in BRQ office available, so any anaconda guy in BRQ can come and test on it.

Comment 29 Peter Kotvan 2014-08-11 12:14:40 UTC
*** Bug 1051897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 30 Vratislav Podzimek 2014-09-04 11:28:47 UTC
This is a python-blivet's issue and the patch is already applied in Rawhide.

Comment 33 Ladislav Jozsa 2014-11-03 13:34:16 UTC
Another user experienced a similar problem:

After I tried to delete all partititions from previous installation of RHEL Atomic host on UEFI enabled machine a traceback has occured.

cmdline:        /usr/bin/python  /sbin/anaconda
cmdline_file:   BOOT_IMAGE=/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=RHEL\x20Atomic\x20Host\x207\x20x86_64 quiet
hashmarkername: anaconda
kernel:         3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64
package:        anaconda-19.31.79-1
packaging.log:  
product:        Red Hat Enterprise Linux
reason:         AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'type'
release:        Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 7.0 (Maipo)
release_type:   pre-release
version:        7.0

Comment 37 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 14:05:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0313.html