Bug 906443 (tupi)

Summary:	Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Paul Wouters <pwouters>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	kevin, luya, puiterwijk, samtygier, volker27, xtingray
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-04-27 15:56:02 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	928937, 1000885

Description Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-01-31 16:21:10 UTC

Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/tupi/tupi-1.spec
SRPM URL: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7706/4917706/tupi-0.2-git01.1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4917705
Fedora Account System Username: puiterwijk

Description:
2D vector-based animation environment for digital artists

Comment 1 Volker Fröhlich 2013-02-01 07:30:58 UTC

*** Bug 871216 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-01 22:58:05 UTC

Please note that the specfile should be named tupi.spec, not tupi-1.spec.

Comment 3 Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-02-02 01:03:29 UTC

Yes, I have that on my local machine.
The only reason I named it tupi-1.spec is so that if I change things for this review, the old links to spec files stay in place.

Comment 4 Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-02-02 02:00:48 UTC

@Kevin: Could you please not add FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as I already have a sponsor? ;)

Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-02 02:50:54 UTC

Weird, I don't remember ever having added FE-NEEDSPONSOR, yet the Bugzilla history claims I did, WTF?!

Comment 6 Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-02-14 09:23:13 UTC

Ok, now an updated version which no longer uses the supplied quazip, but instead uses the system library:

Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/tupi/tupi.spec
SRPM URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/tupi/tupi-0.2-git01.1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4970126

Comment 7 Gustav Gonzalez 2013-02-14 13:19:32 UTC

Dear friends,

I recommend you to use the latest source code of the experimental branch:

https://github.com/xtingray/tupi/tree/experimental

The Quazip bundle was removed from the Tupi's source code several weeks ago.

Comment 8 Kevin Kofler 2013-08-31 01:04:40 UTC

We have a dedicated tracker for Qt-only packages like this now.

Comment 9 Paul Wouters 2013-10-27 01:44:04 UTC

patrick, is this pacakge still wanted? If so, can you package the latest upstream source?

Comment 10 Volker Fröhlich 2014-03-23 22:53:01 UTC

If there are no news, we should close this issue.

Comment 11 Volker Fröhlich 2014-04-27 15:56:02 UTC

I think we can close this issue. Please re-open it if you think I'm wrong.

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:40:56 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days