Bug 906443 - (tupi) Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment [NEEDINFO]
Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Paul Wouters
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
: 871216 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: qt-reviews DESIGN-SW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-01-31 11:21 EST by Patrick Uiterwijk
Modified: 2014-04-27 11:56 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-27 11:56:02 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
pwouters: needinfo? (puiterwijk)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-01-31 11:21:10 EST
Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/tupi/tupi-1.spec
SRPM URL: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7706/4917706/tupi-0.2-git01.1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4917705
Fedora Account System Username: puiterwijk

Description:
2D vector-based animation environment for digital artists
Comment 1 Volker Fröhlich 2013-02-01 02:30:58 EST
*** Bug 871216 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-01 17:58:05 EST
Please note that the specfile should be named tupi.spec, not tupi-1.spec.
Comment 3 Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-02-01 20:03:29 EST
Yes, I have that on my local machine.
The only reason I named it tupi-1.spec is so that if I change things for this review, the old links to spec files stay in place.
Comment 4 Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-02-01 21:00:48 EST
@Kevin: Could you please not add FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as I already have a sponsor? ;)
Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-01 21:50:54 EST
Weird, I don't remember ever having added FE-NEEDSPONSOR, yet the Bugzilla history claims I did, WTF?!
Comment 6 Patrick Uiterwijk 2013-02-14 04:23:13 EST
Ok, now an updated version which no longer uses the supplied quazip, but instead uses the system library:

Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/tupi/tupi.spec
SRPM URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/packages/tupi/tupi-0.2-git01.1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4970126
Comment 7 Gustav Gonzalez 2013-02-14 08:19:32 EST
Dear friends,

I recommend you to use the latest source code of the experimental branch:

https://github.com/xtingray/tupi/tree/experimental

The Quazip bundle was removed from the Tupi's source code several weeks ago.
Comment 8 Kevin Kofler 2013-08-30 21:04:40 EDT
We have a dedicated tracker for Qt-only packages like this now.
Comment 9 Paul Wouters 2013-10-26 21:44:04 EDT
patrick, is this pacakge still wanted? If so, can you package the latest upstream source?
Comment 10 Volker Fröhlich 2014-03-23 18:53:01 EDT
If there are no news, we should close this issue.
Comment 11 Volker Fröhlich 2014-04-27 11:56:02 EDT
I think we can close this issue. Please re-open it if you think I'm wrong.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.