Bug 908830

Summary: check-large-docs.sh doesn't properly skip -doc subpackages
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Frederik Holden <frh+fedora>
Component: fedora-reviewAssignee: Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: leamas.alec, pingou, sochotni
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: fedora-review-0.4.1-1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-04 22:25:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Frederik Holden 2013-02-07 15:58:39 UTC
Description of problem:
check-large-docs.sh is supposed to check the size of doc directories that aren't in -doc subpackages. Whether or not the subpackage is a -doc one is done by the line:
[[ $rpm = *doc ]] && continue
However, the directories in rpms-unpacked are named as so:
foo-doc-1.0.0-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
Since the directories will never end in "-doc" even if they are -doc subpackages, the test will fail packages that have properly split the documentation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.3.1

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Make an SRPM with a large -doc subpackage.
2. Run fedora-review on it.
  
Actual results:
The following test fails:
Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.

Expected results:
The test should pass, as the documentation has been split into a -doc subpackage as required.

Comment 1 Pierre-YvesChibon 2013-02-07 18:54:26 UTC
Could you re-check this with the version in updates-testing?

Thanks!

Comment 2 Frederik Holden 2013-02-07 19:46:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could you re-check this with the version in updates-testing?
> 
> Thanks!

After installing the version in updates-testing, I get another error entirely, which does not appear to be related to the original bug:
http://fpaste.org/BGmf/

Comment 3 Alec Leamas 2013-02-08 09:19:11 UTC
Hm... I can't find that srpm anywhere (c++-gtk-utils). Could you provide a link so I can reproduce it? (yes, this ius something completely different and far worse IMHO)

Comment 4 Frederik Holden 2013-02-08 09:28:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hm... I can't find that srpm anywhere (c++-gtk-utils). Could you provide a
> link so I can reproduce it? (yes, this ius something completely different
> and far worse IMHO)

The c++-gtk-utils SRPM is a work in progress that I'm planning to submit for a package review. I have put it up on my fedorapeople space so that you can test it with this issue:
http://airwave.fedorapeople.org/c++-gtk-utils/c++-gtk-utils.spec
http://airwave.fedorapeople.org/c++-gtk-utils/c++-gtk-utils-2.0.14-1.fc18.src.rpm

Comment 5 Alec Leamas 2013-02-08 10:20:59 UTC
I have found the error: the filename is fed to a regex, and there the ++ in c++ are interpreted as regex repetition markers. This will take some time to figure out how to handle, though. Stay tuned.

Comment 6 Alec Leamas 2013-02-08 10:46:15 UTC
Pushed a fix fro crash to devel branch. The check-large-docs remains to be investigated

Comment 7 Frederik Holden 2013-02-08 10:54:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Pushed a fix fro crash to devel branch. The check-large-docs remains to be
> investigated

Let me know when it's ready for me to test. From a quick look though, the check-large-docs issue does not appear to be fixed in 0.4.0. The script, "check-large-docs.sh", is identical to the one in 0.3.1, and the naming of the directories in "rpms-unpacked" is also the same. Unless I'm missing something, the original issue remains.

Comment 8 Alec Leamas 2013-02-08 15:09:45 UTC
It's fixed in devel branch in git and could be tested now. To do so, you need to checkout the devel version as described in the fedora-review wiki at https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/

Otherwise, there is a new release 0.4.0-3 under way which will have these patches applied. It *might* make before the weekend, but don't hold your breath.

Thanks for this valuable bug report!

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-02-08 15:40:14 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc18

Comment 10 Frederik Holden 2013-02-08 15:41:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> It's fixed in devel branch in git and could be tested now. To do so, you
> need to checkout the devel version as described in the fedora-review wiki at
> https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/
> 
> Otherwise, there is a new release 0.4.0-3 under way which will have these
> patches applied. It *might* make before the weekend, but don't hold your
> breath.

After downloading and running the devel version, I can confirm that both the originally reported bug and the error encountered in 0.4.0 appear to have been fixed.


> Thanks for this valuable bug report!

Thanks for the valuable program! It has been very helpful to me in making my first .spec.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2013-02-08 16:05:02 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc17

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-02-09 11:26:11 UTC
Package fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc17'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2184/fedora-review-0.4.0-3.fc17
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2013-02-21 13:24:11 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.0-4.fc18

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2013-02-21 13:25:05 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.0-4.fc17

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2013-02-21 13:26:37 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.0-4.el6

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2013-03-04 22:25:10 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2013-03-04 22:27:02 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2013-03-11 19:36:27 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.0-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2013-04-29 14:51:18 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc18

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2013-04-29 14:51:57 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.1-1.el6

Comment 21 Fedora Update System 2013-04-29 14:52:25 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc19

Comment 22 Fedora Update System 2013-04-29 14:52:55 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc17

Comment 23 Fedora Update System 2013-05-04 01:42:18 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 24 Fedora Update System 2013-05-14 17:45:32 UTC
fedora-review-0.4.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.