Bug 912
Summary: | Emacs Control-V redefinition | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Robert Thomas <thoma041> |
Component: | emacs | Assignee: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1999-04-08 20:28:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert Thomas
1999-01-21 19:50:11 UTC
I was unable to observe this behaviour using emacs in console mode. Are you running emacs from within X and if so, what window manager are you using? It never occured to me to check the window manager. I am using after step. I did a telnet from another machine and it was defined as I expected. I am not sure how to look into the definition files for after step. I will find it though - could it be that someone wanted to make it more MicroStuff compatible (i.e. Control-v is a paste a friend of mine told me who uses win-95... not admitting that I actually use Windows mind you... understand..?). I'll have to rip it out if it is there though. -Robert |